AI and Copyright: Who Owns Content Created with AI Tools?
The copyright situation with AI-generated content is genuinely confusing and varies by country. Here’s what I’ve gathered from following this closely.
In the US:
– Purely AI-generated content with no human creative input is NOT copyrightable (Thaler v. Perlmutter)
– AI-ASSISTED content where a human provides substantial creative direction CAN be copyrighted
– The Copyright Office has been issuing guidance on a case-by-case basis
In the EU:
– Similar direction: the human must be the “intellectual creator”
– AI can be a tool in the creative process but can’t be the author
Practical implications:
– If you use AI to generate a logo with a basic prompt, you probably can’t copyright it
– If you use AI as part of a larger creative process with significant human curation, editing, and direction, you likely can
– If you use AI to help write code, the copyright situation depends on how much the human directed and modified
The gray area: What counts as “substantial creative direction”? Nobody knows for sure yet. Courts are still working this out.
My approach: I treat AI as a starting point and always add significant human creative input. This gives me the strongest copyright claim and also produces better work.
Any lawyers or IP experts here with additional insight?
6 Replies
Join the discussion.
Log In to Reply
the gray area thing is real and courts are moving so slow on this. by the time there's actual precedent the tools will have changed completely. designers are just flying blind right now.
one practical thing i do: keep a log of every prompt iteration, every edit i made manually, every creative decision. if i ever need to prove substantial human input thats my paper trail. takes 5 extra minutes and worth it.
the logging idea is smart but honestly most people wont do it consistently. needs to be baked into the workflow from day one or it just doesnt happen.
wait does this apply to AI-generated music too? like if i use suno to make a track and then remix it manually, where does that fall?
the 'AI as starting point' framing misses something imo. copyright aside, if your competitor uses the same prompt they get 80% of the same output. the real value is in what you build on top, not protecting the raw output.
transparency is key imo. if youre using AI to make decisions that affect people they have a right to know